Immediately after the Taliban takeover of Kabul, the United States appeared willing to re-engage and develop positive ties with them. Washington was hoping that the Taliban–regarded as relatively clean when compared to other mujahedin factions–would end Afghanistan’s civil war and bring about stability. Pakistan also has encouraged the United States to support the Taliban. However, over time the U.S. attitude has become more critical toward the Taliban. Several factors are behind the change. First, Washington has been unhappy with the Taliban’s humans right record, especially in dealing with women’s issues. Second, the two sides have differed on international terrorism and the hosting of a Saudi businessman known to sponsor anti-U.S. terror in Saudi Arabia. Third, the United States has not been pleased by the Taliban’s refusal to stop the production and trafficking of illegal drugs. Fourth, the United States fears that the Taliban might establish an extremist Islamic state. These factors have discouraged the United States from embracing the group.
Regardless of the many substantial contributions women have made to the United States military from the American Revolutionary war to the contemporary Iraq and Afghanistan wars, it has long been a sanctuary of masculinity, which consequently, has resulted in the organization’s steadfast resistance against women’s direct martial participation.
Argumentative essay on the war in afghanistan | La …
This is why the claim that the war on terrorism differs from other wars makes sense if it refers not to military engagements like those fought in Afghanistan, but to the less conventionally military efforts undertaken to suppress terrorism by the US over the past 30 years. In this struggle, sources of power other than military have long been used. 2 Indeed, economic and diplomatic sanctions, painstaking police work, and even the fitful effort to build an international consensus against terrorism have all proven more effective than the application of conventional military force. One could even say that the only things that distinguish the current, post-9/11 war from previous campaigns against terrorism are the intensity and seriousness with which the US government is now using these means. Commensurate with what it claims to be at stake-the moral and political, if not physical, survival of the US, and the fate of Western civilization-the government’s intensity and seriousness have reached the level at which one can reasonably, though not conventionally perhaps, speak of a war. We should be clear: in this war the relative unimportance of conventional military forces derives not from the limited interests at stake, but from the decision by the enemy to avoid the West’s overwhelming conventional strength and pursue its objectives via other means.
Argumentative Essay-War - 920 Words - StudyMode
From this perspective, the war in Afghanistan is only a small supporting operation in a much larger, more complex conflict. The fighting in Afghanistan destroyed Al Qaeda training bases-a conventional military objective-and increased intelligence about the organization sufficiently so that policemen in Europe and Southeast Asia could arrest terrorists and roll up their support networks, and financial analysts could identify bank accounts for closure. Equally important for success, though, was to do this in such a way as to not build additional support for the terrorists and win them more recruits, but to undermine them both in Afghanistan and around the world. The idea that to succeed against terrorism you must do more than just catch terrorists should not be interpreted to mean that we must appeal to or even appease terrorists’ potential supporters. On the contrary, intimidation and fear can be highly effective tools. Indeed, experience suggests that what is needed is some blend of cooption and coercion-or sticks and carrots -the proportion impossible to specify in the abstract but to be adjusted as the campaign goes forward, and according to the character of the target audience. One constraint on the use of intimidation and fear will be the tolerance of the home political community for harsh measures, a tolerance that may change as the terrorist campaign continues. In any event, whatever the mix of rewards and punishments, the point should be to direct them not only to the terrorists, but beyond them to their sources of support, just as the terrorists direct their violence around military forces to attack the political process directly.
Afghanistan war essay - Do My Research Paper For Me
After thirteen years of sustained military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, coupled with the Syrian civil war, and most recent Ukraine crisis, the United States Army now faces unprecedented challenges for our future. On the verge of economic peril, our government will reshape the army through personnel downsizing not seen since pre-World War II and astronomical defense budget cuts. Although we may not personally agree with this strategy, it is imperative we support these measures as a unified profession. These constraints will ultimately cause our profession to grow in two separate directions; monetarily and inspirationally focused leaders. History has proven inspirationally focused leaders are willing to make the tough personal choices for the greater good of the profession; while monetarily focused individuals will retreat to other means of sustainable living for personal gains. In order for our military to effectively defend the Constitution and American people, we must educate our personnel to be the focused inspirational leaders our country needs.